Sketch end‑to‑end flows from collection to deletion, noting interfaces, protocols, and storage layers. Include admin backends, analytics pipelines, and support tools that may access production. Highlight cross‑border transfers and backups. Real diagrams spark sharper questions and expose sneaky, risky hops you would otherwise miss.
Document responsibilities across identity, network, runtime, and data layers. Ask for a RACI or responsibility matrix covering SSO, logging, backups, and incident response. Misaligned expectations create gaps during outages. Clarity early enables enforceable commitments and faster collaboration when the unexpected unfolds on a Friday evening.







Read the report period, trust criteria covered, complementary user entity controls, subservice organizations, and exceptions. Translate exceptions into risk statements with impact and likelihood. Ask for bridge letters to cover gaps. Confirm fixes with dated artifacts, not promises delivered after procurement signs.

A badge shows intent; sustained control operation shows maturity. Compare statement of applicability or controls matrix with your requirements. Check surveillance audit cadence and nonconformities. CSA STAR entries often reveal more than glossy one‑pagers. Triangulate claims across documents to surface inconsistencies early.

Tailor questions by data sensitivity, user counts, and integration depth. Use CAIQ or SIG libraries as starting points, but trim duplicates and jargon. Provide definitions and scoring guidance. Vendors answer better when they feel respected, and you get cleaner signals faster.

Request live demos of logging, alerting, and access reviews. Spot‑check backups, SSO settings, and role mappings in a sandbox. Compare answers to config screenshots and ticket histories. Light sampling discourages fiction, celebrates excellence, and reveals teams that value transparency under gentle pressure.
Include breach notification timelines, audit rights, vulnerability disclosure expectations, and transparent subprocessor updates. Bind commitments to service levels with remedies. Reference control baselines rather than vague best practices. Strong words are friendliest when they remove uncertainty and set mutually achievable standards.
Ask for RPO and RTO targets, documented recovery playbooks, and tested failover. Probe backup immutability, restore drills, and chaos exercises. Multi‑AZ or region architecture matters less than proof it works. Stories of past recoveries teach more than polished diagrams ever could.
Confirm named contacts, 24x7 channels, initial response times, and regulatory notifications. Review incident classifications, tabletop frequency, and customer update templates. Encourage responsible disclosure and bug bounty programs. When the page goes off, practiced communication preserves trust while engineers contain impact.